https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182050 The court dismissed the petition challenging the constitutionality of land acquisition proceedings, holding the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act valid. It concluded that the acquisition for a company could serve a public purpose if it involved constructing dwelling houses, providing amenities for workmen, or constructing works of public utility. The court found no violation of Articles 14, 19, and 31 of the Constitution, and deemed the petition premature as the investigation into the purpose of acquisition was ongoing. Costs were awarded to the contesting parties. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2016 16:06:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182050 The court dismissed the petition challenging the constitutionality of land acquisition proceedings, holding the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act valid. It concluded that the acquisition for a company could serve a public purpose if it involved constructing dwelling houses, providing amenities for workmen, or constructing works of public utility. The court found no violation of Articles 14, 19, and 31 of the Constitution, and deemed the petition premature as the investigation into the purpose of acquisition was ongoing. Costs were awarded to the contesting parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182050