https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182049 The court dismissed the petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Act, notification, and by-laws, upholding their validity. It found no discrimination or unreasonable restriction on the right to carry on trade and business. The retrospective validation of past actions and fees was deemed adequate, and the revived rules were held valid. The court concluded that the market committee has the authority to issue licenses and collect fees within the prescribed limits. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2016 16:00:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182049 The court dismissed the petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Act, notification, and by-laws, upholding their validity. It found no discrimination or unreasonable restriction on the right to carry on trade and business. The retrospective validation of past actions and fees was deemed adequate, and the revived rules were held valid. The court concluded that the market committee has the authority to issue licenses and collect fees within the prescribed limits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182049