<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1229 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182048</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune allowed the Miscellaneous Application for rectification in a case where the additional Ground raised by the assessee remained unadjudicated in the order. The Tribunal found that the omission to consider grounds set up in appeal was a mistake apparent from the record and allowed the application under Sec. 254(2) of the Act. The appeal was directed to be fixed for hearing on the additional Ground, with the order pronounced on 8th July 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 15:54:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1229 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182048</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune allowed the Miscellaneous Application for rectification in a case where the additional Ground raised by the assessee remained unadjudicated in the order. The Tribunal found that the omission to consider grounds set up in appeal was a mistake apparent from the record and allowed the application under Sec. 254(2) of the Act. The appeal was directed to be fixed for hearing on the additional Ground, with the order pronounced on 8th July 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>