https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182047 The Madras Commercial Crops Markets Act, 1933 and its Rules were upheld as reasonable restrictions on trade because they regulated market buying and selling, licensing, market committees, weighment, storage, price information, and dispute settlement to prevent exploitation of growers by middlemen and profiteers. Applying the constitutional test of reasonableness, the Court found a valid rational connection between the controls and the statutory object, and held that the measures were not unduly harsh or destructive of trade. The challenged provisions therefore remained valid under Article 19(1)(g) read with Article 19(6) of the Constitution. en-us Mon, 06 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2016 15:52:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182047 The Madras Commercial Crops Markets Act, 1933 and its Rules were upheld as reasonable restrictions on trade because they regulated market buying and selling, licensing, market committees, weighment, storage, price information, and dispute settlement to prevent exploitation of growers by middlemen and profiteers. Applying the constitutional test of reasonableness, the Court found a valid rational connection between the controls and the statutory object, and held that the measures were not unduly harsh or destructive of trade. The challenged provisions therefore remained valid under Article 19(1)(g) read with Article 19(6) of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182047