https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182046 Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was unavailable because, in NDPS proceedings, the complaint was filed within the 180-day statutory period under Section 36A(4). The court held that the right to default bail accrues only when investigation remains incomplete and the charge-sheet or complaint is not filed in time, and that this right is lost once such filing is made before release. Administrative registration or later placement before the concerned judge did not revive the expired entitlement, and absence of cognizance did not alter the result. The petition was rejected. en-us Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:54:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182046 Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was unavailable because, in NDPS proceedings, the complaint was filed within the 180-day statutory period under Section 36A(4). The court held that the right to default bail accrues only when investigation remains incomplete and the charge-sheet or complaint is not filed in time, and that this right is lost once such filing is made before release. Administrative registration or later placement before the concerned judge did not revive the expired entitlement, and absence of cognizance did not alter the result. The petition was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182046