<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 380 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182045</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the Bank, ruling that the departmental proceedings were not tainted by the breach of Regulation 68(2)(iii). It held that the orders of the Disciplinary and Appellate Authorities were valid, leading to the dismissal of Grover&#039;s appeal. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 380 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182045</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the Bank, ruling that the departmental proceedings were not tainted by the breach of Regulation 68(2)(iii). It held that the orders of the Disciplinary and Appellate Authorities were valid, leading to the dismissal of Grover&#039;s appeal. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>