<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 109 - CESTAT,MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the respondent regarding the reversal of Cenvat credit for NCCD duty payment. The Tribunal agreed with the lack of intention by the respondent to avail ineligible credit, referencing a Bombay High Court decision and emphasizing the absence of deliberate complicity. Legal precedents and the specific circumstances led to the dismissal of the appeal, highlighting the importance of considering intent in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 109 - CESTAT,MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the respondent regarding the reversal of Cenvat credit for NCCD duty payment. The Tribunal agreed with the lack of intention by the respondent to avail ineligible credit, referencing a Bombay High Court decision and emphasizing the absence of deliberate complicity. Legal precedents and the specific circumstances led to the dismissal of the appeal, highlighting the importance of considering intent in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>