<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1064 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals based on legal precedents and judgments, finding no merits in the arguments presented. The issue of payment of 10% of value of exempted goods under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was deemed inapplicable to the clearance of spent sulphuric acid used in manufacturing fertilizers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1064 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals based on legal precedents and judgments, finding no merits in the arguments presented. The issue of payment of 10% of value of exempted goods under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was deemed inapplicable to the clearance of spent sulphuric acid used in manufacturing fertilizers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>