<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1171 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182028</link>
    <description>Writ interference at the show-cause stage is exceptional and is warranted only when lack of jurisdiction or abuse of process is prima facie shown. Where the challenge to proposed reversal of input tax credit depends on factual adjudication, including objections to the notice and the selling dealers&#039; compliance materials, the writ court will not pre-empt the statutory process. The petitioner must first place its explanation before the assessing authority, and the authority must examine the matter on the record. On that basis, the court declined to interfere with the notices and left the petitioner to pursue objections before the departmental authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1171 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182028</link>
      <description>Writ interference at the show-cause stage is exceptional and is warranted only when lack of jurisdiction or abuse of process is prima facie shown. Where the challenge to proposed reversal of input tax credit depends on factual adjudication, including objections to the notice and the selling dealers&#039; compliance materials, the writ court will not pre-empt the statutory process. The petitioner must first place its explanation before the assessing authority, and the authority must examine the matter on the record. On that basis, the court declined to interfere with the notices and left the petitioner to pursue objections before the departmental authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>