<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1422 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182030</link>
    <description>A co-operative society whose principal business was advancing credit for agricultural purposes and activities connected with agriculture was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The lending pattern included finance for irrigation equipment, agricultural implements, and livestock-related activities such as rearing cows, buffaloes, goats and sheep, which were regarded as part of agricultural and rural development activities. Section 80P(4) was held to exclude only co-operative banks, not a society satisfying the description of a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. The disallowance was therefore held incorrect, and the deduction claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1422 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182030</link>
      <description>A co-operative society whose principal business was advancing credit for agricultural purposes and activities connected with agriculture was treated as eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The lending pattern included finance for irrigation equipment, agricultural implements, and livestock-related activities such as rearing cows, buffaloes, goats and sheep, which were regarded as part of agricultural and rural development activities. Section 80P(4) was held to exclude only co-operative banks, not a society satisfying the description of a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. The disallowance was therefore held incorrect, and the deduction claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>