https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326999 The High Court allowed the appeal, condoning the delay of 302 days in filing the appeal under Section 35G (2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to non-receipt of the notice of hearing. The Court quashed the Tribunal's orders, emphasizing the violation of natural justice principles as the appellant was not given a proper opportunity to present its case. The case was remanded back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, ensuring the appellant's right to a fair hearing and representation in accordance with the audi alteram partem rule and the Canara Bank v. V.K. Awasthy case. en-us Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326999 The High Court allowed the appeal, condoning the delay of 302 days in filing the appeal under Section 35G (2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to non-receipt of the notice of hearing. The Court quashed the Tribunal's orders, emphasizing the violation of natural justice principles as the appellant was not given a proper opportunity to present its case. The case was remanded back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, ensuring the appellant's right to a fair hearing and representation in accordance with the audi alteram partem rule and the Canara Bank v. V.K. Awasthy case. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326999