<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1105 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326991</link>
    <description>The court declined to quash the summons under section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, requiring the petitioners to provide a statement and submit documents. However, regarding the release of goods apprehended from their vehicle, the court directed the petitioners to file a representation outlining their grievances to the Customs Department. The court instructed the petitioners to clarify that goods of Indian origin should not be part of the Customs proceedings and that foreign origin goods could be released upon payment of fines under section 125 of the Customs Act. The Superintendent was expected to make a prompt decision within ten days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:19:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1105 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326991</link>
      <description>The court declined to quash the summons under section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, requiring the petitioners to provide a statement and submit documents. However, regarding the release of goods apprehended from their vehicle, the court directed the petitioners to file a representation outlining their grievances to the Customs Department. The court instructed the petitioners to clarify that goods of Indian origin should not be part of the Customs proceedings and that foreign origin goods could be released upon payment of fines under section 125 of the Customs Act. The Superintendent was expected to make a prompt decision within ten days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>