https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326991 A writ court will not ordinarily interfere with a summons under section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 when it merely requires appearance, a statement and production of documents; the summons was therefore left intact. The court also declined direct writ relief for release of detained goods, holding that the proper course was for the petitioners to make a representation before the competent customs officer and raise all grievances, including their claims on customs jurisdiction and release on payment of fine under section 125. The authority was directed to consider the representation expeditiously. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:19:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326991 A writ court will not ordinarily interfere with a summons under section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 when it merely requires appearance, a statement and production of documents; the summons was therefore left intact. The court also declined direct writ relief for release of detained goods, holding that the proper course was for the petitioners to make a representation before the competent customs officer and raise all grievances, including their claims on customs jurisdiction and release on payment of fine under section 125. The authority was directed to consider the representation expeditiously. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326991