https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182021 The court dismissed the successive bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC, noting the lack of prior bail application before the Sessions Court. The examination of merits for default bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC was not considered a successive bail application. The non-inclusion of psychotropic substances in Schedule I of the NDPS Rules was discussed, emphasizing the prohibition under Section 8 of the NDPS Act. The court highlighted the violation of NDPS Rules regarding possession and export of substances, leading to the denial of bail due to public interest and risk of recurrence. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2016 10:38:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182021 The court dismissed the successive bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC, noting the lack of prior bail application before the Sessions Court. The examination of merits for default bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC was not considered a successive bail application. The non-inclusion of psychotropic substances in Schedule I of the NDPS Rules was discussed, emphasizing the prohibition under Section 8 of the NDPS Act. The court highlighted the violation of NDPS Rules regarding possession and export of substances, leading to the denial of bail due to public interest and risk of recurrence. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182021