<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 688 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182017</link>
    <description>The court rejected the petition seeking retesting of seized samples, finding the investigation fair and orders by the Addl. Session Judge valid. The court held that the initial test confirming Methamphetamine Hydrochloride by DFS was conclusive, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s argument for retesting under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The petition was dismissed without costs, deeming the request premature and misconceived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:51:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 688 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182017</link>
      <description>The court rejected the petition seeking retesting of seized samples, finding the investigation fair and orders by the Addl. Session Judge valid. The court held that the initial test confirming Methamphetamine Hydrochloride by DFS was conclusive, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s argument for retesting under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The petition was dismissed without costs, deeming the request premature and misconceived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>