<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 657 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182014</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition to the extent that only the unadjusted portion of the fixed charge for entry into the discotheques should be taxed. The court calculated the taxable amount based on the ratio of unadjusted charges in one of the discotheques. The petitioner was directed to deposit the specified amounts towards entertainment tax, and the bank guarantee was to be discharged upon payment. Each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 657 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182014</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition to the extent that only the unadjusted portion of the fixed charge for entry into the discotheques should be taxed. The court calculated the taxable amount based on the ratio of unadjusted charges in one of the discotheques. The petitioner was directed to deposit the specified amounts towards entertainment tax, and the bank guarantee was to be discharged upon payment. Each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>