<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (4) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182010</link>
    <description>Cancellation of citizenship registration was invalid because deprivation under the Citizenship Act could be exercised only on proof of fraud, false representation, or concealment of a material fact, and that ground was not established on the record. The applicants had disclosed that earlier attempts to secure permission to settle permanently in India had been rejected, so suppression was not proved. Section 21 of the General Clauses Act could not be used to enlarge the Collector&#039;s power where the special citizenship statute created a limited scheme for registration and deprivation. The cancellation orders and the direction to leave India were set aside, with costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:17:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (4) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182010</link>
      <description>Cancellation of citizenship registration was invalid because deprivation under the Citizenship Act could be exercised only on proof of fraud, false representation, or concealment of a material fact, and that ground was not established on the record. The applicants had disclosed that earlier attempts to secure permission to settle permanently in India had been rejected, so suppression was not proved. Section 21 of the General Clauses Act could not be used to enlarge the Collector&#039;s power where the special citizenship statute created a limited scheme for registration and deprivation. The cancellation orders and the direction to leave India were set aside, with costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>