https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182008 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that Rule 17 of the Employees' State Insurance Rule exceeded the State Government's rule-making authority under Sec. 96(1)(b) of the Employees' State Insurance Act. Consequently, applications filed by the Corporation to the Employees' Insurance Court are subject to a three-year limitation period under Art. 137 of the Limitation Act of 1963. The appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182008 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that Rule 17 of the Employees' State Insurance Rule exceeded the State Government's rule-making authority under Sec. 96(1)(b) of the Employees' State Insurance Act. Consequently, applications filed by the Corporation to the Employees' Insurance Court are subject to a three-year limitation period under Art. 137 of the Limitation Act of 1963. The appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182008