<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1090 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, agreeing with the CIT (A) that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the cash deposit and that the transaction was genuine. The penalty under Section 271D was deemed uncalled for and was thus cancelled. The judgment referenced several supporting cases, reinforcing the principle that penalties should not be imposed for genuine transactions where reasonable cause is established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:26:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1090 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, agreeing with the CIT (A) that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the cash deposit and that the transaction was genuine. The penalty under Section 271D was deemed uncalled for and was thus cancelled. The judgment referenced several supporting cases, reinforcing the principle that penalties should not be imposed for genuine transactions where reasonable cause is established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>