<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1081 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee-firm by deleting the additions of Rs. 35,79,224/- for bogus purchases and Rs. 86,917/- under section 14A. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing positive evidence to support claims of genuine transactions and the correct application of disallowance rules under section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:26:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1081 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee-firm by deleting the additions of Rs. 35,79,224/- for bogus purchases and Rs. 86,917/- under section 14A. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing positive evidence to support claims of genuine transactions and the correct application of disallowance rules under section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>