<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1076 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326962</link>
    <description>The appeal and connected special leave petitions were dismissed because the show cause notice and the Order-in-Original contained no reference to penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The Court left the question of law open, without deciding the legal effect of that omission on penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1076 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326962</link>
      <description>The appeal and connected special leave petitions were dismissed because the show cause notice and the Order-in-Original contained no reference to penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The Court left the question of law open, without deciding the legal effect of that omission on penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>