https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326958 The High Court dismissed the Revenue's application seeking condonation of a 422-day delay in applying for restoration of an appeal. The Court criticized the Revenue's casual approach to procedural requirements and emphasized the importance of vigilance in preventing defaults. It highlighted that governmental inefficiencies and negligence cannot justify condoning delays. The Court found no merit in the Revenue's Notice of Motion for condonation of delay, ultimately dismissing it due to insufficient reasons provided in the affidavit-in-support. en-us Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326958 The High Court dismissed the Revenue's application seeking condonation of a 422-day delay in applying for restoration of an appeal. The Court criticized the Revenue's casual approach to procedural requirements and emphasized the importance of vigilance in preventing defaults. It highlighted that governmental inefficiencies and negligence cannot justify condoning delays. The Court found no merit in the Revenue's Notice of Motion for condonation of delay, ultimately dismissing it due to insufficient reasons provided in the affidavit-in-support. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326958