https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181994 Land described in a grant certificate was held not to be a granted land under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978, because its recitals, read with the darkhast register extract and Form I, showed purchase in a public auction for a price. The Court applied the principle that a document must be construed by its substance and recitals, not its title alone, and on that basis found Section 4 inapplicable. It also held that certiorari or supervisory jurisdiction does not extend to disturbing concurrent factual findings absent jurisdictional error or grave injustice, so interference was rightly refused. en-us Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181994 Land described in a grant certificate was held not to be a granted land under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978, because its recitals, read with the darkhast register extract and Form I, showed purchase in a public auction for a price. The Court applied the principle that a document must be construed by its substance and recitals, not its title alone, and on that basis found Section 4 inapplicable. It also held that certiorari or supervisory jurisdiction does not extend to disturbing concurrent factual findings absent jurisdictional error or grave injustice, so interference was rightly refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181994