https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326948 In an NDPS matter involving alleged commercial quantity, the Court applied the Act's stringent bail restrictions and held that prima facie prosecution material linked the applicant to the offence. Conflicting forensic reports and other evidentiary objections were treated as matters for trial, not as grounds for release at the bail stage. The Court further held that prolonged custody by itself does not override the statutory limits on bail absent material showing reasonable grounds to believe the applicant is not guilty and will not reoffend while on bail. Successive bail was therefore rejected. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326948 In an NDPS matter involving alleged commercial quantity, the Court applied the Act's stringent bail restrictions and held that prima facie prosecution material linked the applicant to the offence. Conflicting forensic reports and other evidentiary objections were treated as matters for trial, not as grounds for release at the bail stage. The Court further held that prolonged custody by itself does not override the statutory limits on bail absent material showing reasonable grounds to believe the applicant is not guilty and will not reoffend while on bail. Successive bail was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326948