<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 518 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181970</link>
    <description>A chemical examination report obtained in the course of criminal proceedings is treated as admissible under Section 293 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Where two sample reports conflict, the report supporting the accused may be relied on for quashing proceedings if the prosecution does not lay a proper basis to impeach it. The note emphasises that a report not supported by the same procedural footing cannot easily displace the later report when the court is deciding whether prosecution should continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:40:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 518 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181970</link>
      <description>A chemical examination report obtained in the course of criminal proceedings is treated as admissible under Section 293 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Where two sample reports conflict, the report supporting the accused may be relied on for quashing proceedings if the prosecution does not lay a proper basis to impeach it. The note emphasises that a report not supported by the same procedural footing cannot easily displace the later report when the court is deciding whether prosecution should continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>