<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 852 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181963</link>
    <description>Delay in re-filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was dismissed. The order records no further reasoning on the merits, so the operative legal effect is limited to the acceptance of the delay application and the dismissal of the central excise challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:00:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 852 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181963</link>
      <description>Delay in re-filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was dismissed. The order records no further reasoning on the merits, so the operative legal effect is limited to the acceptance of the delay application and the dismissal of the central excise challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>