<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 875 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the revenue, disallowing the deduction of Society Maintenance Charges from the house property income. The Tribunal held that such charges were not allowable deductions under sections 23 or 24 of the Income-tax Act, following precedents from the Delhi High Court and the Bombay High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and reinstated that of the Assessing Officer, allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:53:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 875 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the revenue, disallowing the deduction of Society Maintenance Charges from the house property income. The Tribunal held that such charges were not allowable deductions under sections 23 or 24 of the Income-tax Act, following precedents from the Delhi High Court and the Bombay High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and reinstated that of the Assessing Officer, allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>