<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 157 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3240</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, favoring the appellant company and its partner, and dismissed the appeals by the revenue. The decision emphasized the significance of accurate valuation declarations by job workers and the constraints on invoking extended periods for duty recovery without proof of collusion or misdeclaration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 157 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3240</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, favoring the appellant company and its partner, and dismissed the appeals by the revenue. The decision emphasized the significance of accurate valuation declarations by job workers and the constraints on invoking extended periods for duty recovery without proof of collusion or misdeclaration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>