<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1108 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181946</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, the special leave petition was dismissed, and the Supreme Court requested the High Court to hear and dispose of the pending writ petition expeditiously. The operative point is limited to procedural disposal at the leave stage, with no substantive ruling on the underlying central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1108 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181946</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, the special leave petition was dismissed, and the Supreme Court requested the High Court to hear and dispose of the pending writ petition expeditiously. The operative point is limited to procedural disposal at the leave stage, with no substantive ruling on the underlying central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>