https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181940 The court declined to address the merits of the case as the petitioner's representation was pending for a decision expected within a month. The petition was disposed of with the expectation that the respondent-State would decide on the petitioner's representation within the stipulated time. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to provide necessary documents and submissions in support of their claim and to challenge any adverse decision before an appropriate forum. The respondent was directed to decide on any additional submissions within one month from the date of receipt. en-us Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:00:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181940 The court declined to address the merits of the case as the petitioner's representation was pending for a decision expected within a month. The petition was disposed of with the expectation that the respondent-State would decide on the petitioner's representation within the stipulated time. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to provide necessary documents and submissions in support of their claim and to challenge any adverse decision before an appropriate forum. The respondent was directed to decide on any additional submissions within one month from the date of receipt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181940