<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1049 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326935</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that income from the sale of flat and plots should be classified as business income rather than capital gains. The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to verify the genuineness of disallowed expenditures for construction materials and labor charges. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1049 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326935</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that income from the sale of flat and plots should be classified as business income rather than capital gains. The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to verify the genuineness of disallowed expenditures for construction materials and labor charges. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>