<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1038 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326924</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2008-09. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s participation in the assessment proceedings and the availability of an alternative remedy under the Act precluded the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments and objections, the Court found their actions indicated participation, disentitling them from relief. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s power to issue reopening notices under specific conditions and dismissed the petition, allowing a limited stay for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1038 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326924</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2008-09. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s participation in the assessment proceedings and the availability of an alternative remedy under the Act precluded the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments and objections, the Court found their actions indicated participation, disentitling them from relief. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s power to issue reopening notices under specific conditions and dismissed the petition, allowing a limited stay for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>