<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1035 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the cost of free supply of materials for providing &#039;Commercial or Industrial Construction Services&#039; should not be included in the service tax liability. The Tribunal relied on the judgment of the Larger Bench and concluded that the value of free supplies need not be included for discharging service tax, aligning with the law established by the Larger Bench. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant based on authoritative judicial pronouncements and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1035 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the cost of free supply of materials for providing &#039;Commercial or Industrial Construction Services&#039; should not be included in the service tax liability. The Tribunal relied on the judgment of the Larger Bench and concluded that the value of free supplies need not be included for discharging service tax, aligning with the law established by the Larger Bench. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant based on authoritative judicial pronouncements and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>