<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1034 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding service tax from the appellant for services received from foreign providers. The Tribunal considered the timing of the service receipt in relation to the relevant legal provisions, following a precedent established by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court, affirmed by the Supreme Court and accepted by the Board. Emphasizing the importance of legal precedents and adherence to established principles in tax matters, the Tribunal&#039;s decision highlighted the impact of judicial decisions on similar cases and the need for legal clarity and consistency in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:04:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1034 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding service tax from the appellant for services received from foreign providers. The Tribunal considered the timing of the service receipt in relation to the relevant legal provisions, following a precedent established by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court, affirmed by the Supreme Court and accepted by the Board. Emphasizing the importance of legal precedents and adherence to established principles in tax matters, the Tribunal&#039;s decision highlighted the impact of judicial decisions on similar cases and the need for legal clarity and consistency in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>