<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 151 - HIGH COURT ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3233</link>
    <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice dated 28-12-2006 regarding property attachment. The court held that the proviso to Section 11 of the Central Excise Act does not apply to personal property sales where the subsequent owner is unaware of existing liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 151 - HIGH COURT ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3233</link>
      <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice dated 28-12-2006 regarding property attachment. The court held that the proviso to Section 11 of the Central Excise Act does not apply to personal property sales where the subsequent owner is unaware of existing liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>