<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1029 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326915</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the registration and disposal of the revision application in accordance with the law. The objections on maintainability and the petitioner&#039;s submissions were kept open for future resolution based on their merits. The court emphasized the absence of malafides on the part of the petitioner, acknowledged the functioning of government departments, and highlighted the lack of gross negligence or deliberate delay in filing the revision application. The objections raised mainly focused on the maintainability of the application and the merits of the issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1029 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326915</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the registration and disposal of the revision application in accordance with the law. The objections on maintainability and the petitioner&#039;s submissions were kept open for future resolution based on their merits. The court emphasized the absence of malafides on the part of the petitioner, acknowledged the functioning of government departments, and highlighted the lack of gross negligence or deliberate delay in filing the revision application. The objections raised mainly focused on the maintainability of the application and the merits of the issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>