https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326913 The High Court held that it did not have territorial jurisdiction to entertain a petition challenging excise duty refund orders due to the Excise Authorities being located in Orissa. The petitioners, a unit in a Special Economic Zone, sought to quash an Order-in-Appeal regarding the refund of central excise duty but were denied relief by the Deputy Commissioner and the Appellate Commissioner. The Court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy before the CESTAT in Orissa and disposed of the petition accordingly. en-us Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326913 The High Court held that it did not have territorial jurisdiction to entertain a petition challenging excise duty refund orders due to the Excise Authorities being located in Orissa. The petitioners, a unit in a Special Economic Zone, sought to quash an Order-in-Appeal regarding the refund of central excise duty but were denied relief by the Deputy Commissioner and the Appellate Commissioner. The Court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy before the CESTAT in Orissa and disposed of the petition accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326913