<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1025 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326911</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction to grant passport release and permission to travel abroad ceased once a complaint under the Central Excise Act was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut. Because the dispute was already pending before the competent court at Meerut, the Delhi High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to issue ancillary relief relating to the passport or foreign travel. The request was therefore declined, and the petition failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1025 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326911</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction to grant passport release and permission to travel abroad ceased once a complaint under the Central Excise Act was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut. Because the dispute was already pending before the competent court at Meerut, the Delhi High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to issue ancillary relief relating to the passport or foreign travel. The request was therefore declined, and the petition failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>