https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326909 In an appeal against acquittal in an NDPS prosecution, interference is unwarranted where the High Court's finding that the alleged recovery was doubtful rests on a detailed appraisal of evidence and is not shown to be perverse. The High Court relied on inconsistencies in the prosecution version, unnatural features in the recovery, and an incomplete chain of circumstances; those defects went to the root of the case and undermined the veracity of the recovery. Even if there was debate on Section 50 compliance or the admissibility of the FSL report, the doubtful recovery finding remained intact, so the acquittal was justified. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:59:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326909 In an appeal against acquittal in an NDPS prosecution, interference is unwarranted where the High Court's finding that the alleged recovery was doubtful rests on a detailed appraisal of evidence and is not shown to be perverse. The High Court relied on inconsistencies in the prosecution version, unnatural features in the recovery, and an incomplete chain of circumstances; those defects went to the root of the case and undermined the veracity of the recovery. Even if there was debate on Section 50 compliance or the admissibility of the FSL report, the doubtful recovery finding remained intact, so the acquittal was justified. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326909