<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1022 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326908</link>
    <description>The impugned order and the order-in-original were set aside because the petitioner had obtained the EODC Certificate after the appellate order was passed. In the special circumstances noted, the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh examination of the case after considering the certificate. The authority was directed to give the petitioner notice of hearing before deciding afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:58:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1022 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326908</link>
      <description>The impugned order and the order-in-original were set aside because the petitioner had obtained the EODC Certificate after the appellate order was passed. In the special circumstances noted, the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh examination of the case after considering the certificate. The authority was directed to give the petitioner notice of hearing before deciding afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>