<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1021 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326907</link>
    <description>The Kerala High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition challenging an appellate order under the Customs Act issued by the 3rd respondent located in Chennai. The court clarified that the appropriate jurisdiction for such petitions is with the High Court having jurisdiction over the original authority. The High Court also noted the availability of an alternate remedy through an appeal before the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of grounds, affirming the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s refund claim for customs duty paid during the import of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1021 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326907</link>
      <description>The Kerala High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition challenging an appellate order under the Customs Act issued by the 3rd respondent located in Chennai. The court clarified that the appropriate jurisdiction for such petitions is with the High Court having jurisdiction over the original authority. The High Court also noted the availability of an alternate remedy through an appeal before the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of grounds, affirming the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s refund claim for customs duty paid during the import of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>