<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1020 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order cancelling the appellant&#039;s license as a Customs House Agent due to procedural irregularities and delays in the proceedings, which violated the statutory time limits prescribed under CHALR 2004 and CBLR 2013. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was deemed legally unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of strict adherence to time limits in such cases, citing relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1020 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order cancelling the appellant&#039;s license as a Customs House Agent due to procedural irregularities and delays in the proceedings, which violated the statutory time limits prescribed under CHALR 2004 and CBLR 2013. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was deemed legally unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of strict adherence to time limits in such cases, citing relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>