<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1015 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326901</link>
    <description>The Central Information Commission found that the CPIO wrongfully denied information under the RTI Act based on a false claim of a pending investigation. The Commission noted the error of judgment by the CPIO in applying Section 8(1)(h) incorrectly but found no malafide intent. The CPIO was directed to be more diligent in the future, and the appeal was disposed of with directions for the free provision of the decision copy to the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1015 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326901</link>
      <description>The Central Information Commission found that the CPIO wrongfully denied information under the RTI Act based on a false claim of a pending investigation. The Commission noted the error of judgment by the CPIO in applying Section 8(1)(h) incorrectly but found no malafide intent. The CPIO was directed to be more diligent in the future, and the appeal was disposed of with directions for the free provision of the decision copy to the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>