<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1014 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326900</link>
    <description>Challenge was raised to a circular and consequential notices on VAT treatment of invisible loss in manufacture and reversal of input tax credit, with the petitioners relying on an earlier common order on the same issue. The HC disposed of the writ petitions by applying that earlier order to the present matters and directed the respondents to pass fresh orders in accordance with those directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1014 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326900</link>
      <description>Challenge was raised to a circular and consequential notices on VAT treatment of invisible loss in manufacture and reversal of input tax credit, with the petitioners relying on an earlier common order on the same issue. The HC disposed of the writ petitions by applying that earlier order to the present matters and directed the respondents to pass fresh orders in accordance with those directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>