<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1014 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326900</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras addressed challenges related to VAT payment for invisible loss of yarn under the TNVAT Act. It clarified that Section 18 is subject to Section 19 restrictions, emphasizing the need for dealers to comply with conditions for refund claims. The Court ruled against adopting uniform percentages for invisible loss without proper examination, setting aside orders reversing Input Tax Credit based on adhoc percentages. Assessing Authorities were directed to issue clear show cause notices before revising refunds, ensuring compliance with Section 19 restrictions. The Court emphasized the importance of Form W undertaking for refund verification and provided guidance for handling invisible loss issues. The Writ Petitions were disposed in favor of adhering to outlined procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1014 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326900</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras addressed challenges related to VAT payment for invisible loss of yarn under the TNVAT Act. It clarified that Section 18 is subject to Section 19 restrictions, emphasizing the need for dealers to comply with conditions for refund claims. The Court ruled against adopting uniform percentages for invisible loss without proper examination, setting aside orders reversing Input Tax Credit based on adhoc percentages. Assessing Authorities were directed to issue clear show cause notices before revising refunds, ensuring compliance with Section 19 restrictions. The Court emphasized the importance of Form W undertaking for refund verification and provided guidance for handling invisible loss issues. The Writ Petitions were disposed in favor of adhering to outlined procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>