https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326899 Writ petitions challenging VAT assessment orders on invisible loss of yarn were treated as covered by an earlier batch decision on the same issue. The respondent accepted that the earlier directions applied to the petitioner, so the petitions were disposed of without an independent merits determination. Fresh orders must be passed in accordance with those earlier directions, and the respondent is bound to follow them when dealing with the issue of invisible loss. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326899 Writ petitions challenging VAT assessment orders on invisible loss of yarn were treated as covered by an earlier batch decision on the same issue. The respondent accepted that the earlier directions applied to the petitioner, so the petitions were disposed of without an independent merits determination. Fresh orders must be passed in accordance with those earlier directions, and the respondent is bound to follow them when dealing with the issue of invisible loss. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326899