https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181912 The Court determined that the conclusion of the trial against one accused does not nullify the summoning order for another person under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Emphasizing the mandatory nature of a fresh trial for newly added persons, the Court clarified that trying newly added accused together is a directory provision. The High Court's declaration of the summoning order as without jurisdiction was deemed erroneous, and the case was remanded for further consideration. The appeal was allowed, directing the High Court to expedite the decision within three months. en-us Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:05:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181912 The Court determined that the conclusion of the trial against one accused does not nullify the summoning order for another person under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Emphasizing the mandatory nature of a fresh trial for newly added persons, the Court clarified that trying newly added accused together is a directory provision. The High Court's declaration of the summoning order as without jurisdiction was deemed erroneous, and the case was remanded for further consideration. The appeal was allowed, directing the High Court to expedite the decision within three months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181912