<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 682 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181904</link>
    <description>The High Court held that exemption for leave encashment payments under section 10(10AA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies only upon retirement, not during ongoing employment. The retrospective amendment from 1984 clarified this, limiting the exemption to retirement-related payments. The Court rejected the Tribunal&#039;s broader interpretation, aligning with legislative intent to restrict relief to retiring employees. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying exemption for leave encashment received while in service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:35:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 682 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181904</link>
      <description>The High Court held that exemption for leave encashment payments under section 10(10AA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies only upon retirement, not during ongoing employment. The retrospective amendment from 1984 clarified this, limiting the exemption to retirement-related payments. The Court rejected the Tribunal&#039;s broader interpretation, aligning with legislative intent to restrict relief to retiring employees. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying exemption for leave encashment received while in service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>