https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181900 In retrenchment disputes involving daily-wage workmen, the workman bears the initial burden of proving completion of 240 days' continuous service to attract section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. Mere assertion is insufficient, but the burden may be discharged by oral testimony and supporting material, especially where the employer withholds relevant muster rolls. The note also states that writ interference with concurrent Labour Court findings is confined to cases of perversity or lack of evidence. On those principles, a Labour Court finding based on a service certificate and unrefuted records should ordinarily not be disturbed. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:49:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181900 In retrenchment disputes involving daily-wage workmen, the workman bears the initial burden of proving completion of 240 days' continuous service to attract section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. Mere assertion is insufficient, but the burden may be discharged by oral testimony and supporting material, especially where the employer withholds relevant muster rolls. The note also states that writ interference with concurrent Labour Court findings is confined to cases of perversity or lack of evidence. On those principles, a Labour Court finding based on a service certificate and unrefuted records should ordinarily not be disturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181900