<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1017 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all three assessment years, deleting additions under Section 2(22)(e) as transactions were business-related, not loans. The jurisdictional challenge under Section 153A was not ruled upon, and interest charges under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C were not addressed due to the primary additions being deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:22:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1017 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all three assessment years, deleting additions under Section 2(22)(e) as transactions were business-related, not loans. The jurisdictional challenge under Section 153A was not ruled upon, and interest charges under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C were not addressed due to the primary additions being deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>