https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181896 The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for a waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax Amount and penalty, totaling &8377; 5,67,813 and &8377; 11,37,126, respectively. The appellant successfully argued that they were wrongly classified as a 'Consulting Engineer' for Service Tax purposes, emphasizing their provision of drawing and design services without offering consultancy advice. Relying on a previous Bench judgment and a Board Circular, the Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's position and stayed the recovery of the disputed amounts until the appeal's final disposal, scheduled for a hearing on 7-3-2005. en-us Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:34:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181896 The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for a waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax Amount and penalty, totaling &8377; 5,67,813 and &8377; 11,37,126, respectively. The appellant successfully argued that they were wrongly classified as a 'Consulting Engineer' for Service Tax purposes, emphasizing their provision of drawing and design services without offering consultancy advice. Relying on a previous Bench judgment and a Board Circular, the Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's position and stayed the recovery of the disputed amounts until the appeal's final disposal, scheduled for a hearing on 7-3-2005. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181896