<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1012 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326898</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, dismissing the claim for agricultural income due to lack of evidence, disallowing interest on delayed TDS payment as penal in nature, and reducing the adhoc disallowance for labor charges for a civil contractor. The decision was pronounced on 16th March 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:26:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1012 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326898</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, dismissing the claim for agricultural income due to lack of evidence, disallowing interest on delayed TDS payment as penal in nature, and reducing the adhoc disallowance for labor charges for a civil contractor. The decision was pronounced on 16th March 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>